Mar 30, 2026
ShareIn a noteworthy trademark ruling, the Madras High Court held that the use of the name Geetham did not amount to trademark infringement of the well-known Sangeetha brand. However, the court found the defendant liable for passing off, recognising the likelihood of consumer confusion.
Background of the Case
The dispute arose between the established restaurant chain “Sangeetha” and another restaurant operating under the name “Geetham.” The plaintiff argued that the defendant’s mark was deceptively similar and could mislead customers.The defendant, on the other hand, contended that the names were different and did not directly copy the registered trademark.
Court’s Observation
The Madras High Court made an important distinction:
This means that even if there is no direct trademark infringement, a business can still be restrained if its branding misleads the public.
Trademark Infringement vs Passing Off
This case clearly explains the difference:
Trademark Infringement
Passing Off
The “Geetham vs Sangeetha” case shows that even if trademark infringement is not established, passing off can still apply. Businesses must ensure that their brand names are not only legally distinct but also visually and phonetically different to avoid confusion.
Strong intellectual property rights protection, supported by proper trademark registration, participation in trademark hearings, and guidance from a professional trademark consultant, is essential for long-term brand success.
Customers WorldWide Trust Us
We File For The Win
We Are Experts In What We Do